The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

An Interdisciplinary MIT Study




Interested in...


Mapping coal’s decline and renewables' rise

Mapping coal’s decline and renewables' rise

CoalMap online tool shows what policy regulations and technological advancements can do for the cost-competitiveness of solar and wind energy.

June 23, 2016Read more

In this video, the study co-chairs - Professor Ernest J. Moniz, Director of the MIT Energy Initiative and Professor Mujid Kazimi, Director of the MIT Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems - join Dr. Charles Forsberg, Executive Director of the MIT Nuclear Fuel Cycle Study, and other members of the study group present and discuss the report's findings and recommendations.



The recent earthquake, tsunami, and subsequent nuclear accident in Japan occurred as this report was going to press. Our sympathies to the Japanese people.

The implications on the world energy system, beyond short-term price increases from greater use of oil and liquefied natural gas, are yet unknown and go beyond nuclear energy. From a technical perspective, there will be the lessons learned such as higher tsunami walls and the need for vented reactor containments that do not require emergency power for operations. The broader conclusions are less clear. As of this writing there have been no off-site casualties as a consequence of the reactor accident under extreme events.

The accident included damage to reactors and to spent fuel storage pools. Both the reactor cores and the pools appear to be sources of radionuclide releases. The accident potential would have been greatly reduced if there were smaller inventories of spent fuel in pools. In the United States many utility spent fuel storage pools are full—a consequence of a failed repository program and the lack of a national spent nuclear fuel policy. The accident in Japan strongly argues for the United States to have a national spent fuel policy—rather than the ad-hoc policies that currently exist.

For policy reasons, we argue for a century planning horizon for spent fuel storage to maintain options for the future. We believe that spent fuel can be stored safety at the reactor, in a centralized facility, or in a repository with the option for future retrieval. The preferred technology for the reactor and centralized facilities is dry cask storage—a very robust storage option under extreme conditions. Some of the spend fuel at the Japanese reactor site is in dry storage.

The accident in Japan strengthens the case for either centralized spent fuel storage or disposal in a repository with the option for future recovery. The safety and security associate with a repository are many orders of magnitude greater than other spent fuel storage technologies—again arguing for a national priority to develop and build a geological repository for spent fuel and high-level wastes.


  • Mujid Kazimi — Co CHAIR
    Tokyo Electric Professor of Nclear Engineering
    Director, Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems
    Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
    Department of Mechanical Engineering
  • Ernest J. Moniz — Co CHAIR
    Department of Physics
    Cecil and Ida Green Prof of Physics and of Engineering Systems
    Director MIT Energy Initiative
  • Charles W. Forsberg
    Executive Director MIT Fuel Cycle Study
    Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering


  • Steve Ansolabehere
    Professor of Government, Harvard University
  • John M. Deutch
    Institute Professor
    Department of Chemistry
  • Michael J. Driscoll
    Professor Emeritus
    Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
  • Michael W. Golay
    Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering
  • Andrew C. Kadak
    Professor of the Practice
    Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
  • John E. Parsons
    Senior Lecturer, Sloan School of Management, MIT Executive Director, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and the Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
  • Monica Regalbuto
    Visiting Scientist, Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
    Department Head, Process Chemistry and Engineering
    Argonne National Laboratory


Other reports in this series: